Vision (TDX) vs McKesson Paragon

McKesson Paragon and Vision (TDX) are both Electronic Health Record systems used in healthcare settings. Paragon offers a comprehensive platform for managing patient data and streamlining workflows, while Vision (TDX) focuses on providing a user-friendly interface and customizable features for healthcare professionals.

General information

Vision (TDX)
McKesson Paragon
Introduction :
Vision (TDX) is a widely used Electronic Health Record system in the UK, known for its user-friendly interface and comprehensive features. Launched in the early 2000s, Vision is popular among NHS trusts and GP practices for its ability to streamline workflows and improve patient care. It is not open source but offers a range of customization options to suit different healthcare settings.
Introduction :
McKesson Paragon is a comprehensive EHR system that has been in use since the 1980s, making it one of the longest-standing platforms in the market. It is not open source but is highly popular due to its user-friendly interface, robust features for various healthcare settings, and strong integration capabilities. McKesson Paragon is widely used in hospitals and healthcare facilities for its ability to streamline workflows and improve patient care.
Advantages :
  • Seamless integration with other healthcare systems
  • User-friendly interface for easy navigation
  • Customizable templates for personalized patient care
  • Robust data security measures to protect patient information
  • Efficient workflow management tools to streamline administrative tasks
Advantages :
  • User-friendly interface for easy navigation and efficient workflow processes.
  • Customizable to meet specific needs of healthcare providers and organizations.
  • Seamless integration with other systems for comprehensive patient care coordination.
  • Robust reporting and analytics capabilities for data-driven decision-making.
  • Strong customer support and training resources for successful implementation.
Disadvantages :
  • Limited integration with other EHR systems
  • Steep learning curve for users
  • Lack of customization options for different healthcare settings
  • Higher cost compared to other EHR platforms
  • Limited support for mobile access and telemedicine services
Disadvantages :
  • Limited interoperability with other systems
  • Steep learning curve for users
  • High implementation and maintenance costs
  • Lack of customization options
  • Limited support for specialty-specific workflows
Manufacturer : Vision (TDX) is manufactured by INPS
INPS is a well-established provider of EHR systems in the UK healthcare sector. Vision (TDX) is known for its user-friendly interface and comprehensive functionality, making it a popular choice among healthcare organizations.
Manufacturer : McKesson
McKesson Paragon is manufactured by McKesson Corporation, a leading healthcare technology company known for providing innovative solutions for healthcare organizations. McKesson Paragon offers a comprehensive electronic health record system for efficient patient care management.
Official website : https://www.tdx.co.uk/


Commercial details

Vision (TDX)
McKesson Paragon
🟡 Open source : Partially.
Vision (TDX) is partially open source, with certain components available for public viewing and modification. The platform primarily uses proprietary code, limiting full transparency and customization.
🟡 Open source : Partially.
McKesson Paragon is not fully open source, but it does offer some level of openness for customization and integration with other systems. The code is not publicly available.
⚪ Free option : Unknown.
It is unclear if Vision (TDX) offers a free option. More information is needed to determine if there is a hosted option with limited features available for users.
⚪ Free option : Unknown.
It is unclear if McKesson Paragon offers a free option. Further research or contacting the provider directly may be necessary to determine if there are any hosted or limited feature options available.
🟢 Hosted : Yes.
Hosted options are available for Vision (TDX) through third-party vendors, offering flexibility and convenience for users who prefer a managed solution. Pricing and features may vary depending on the provider.
⚪ Hosted : Unknown.
There may be hosted options available for McKesson Paragon, but specific details on pricing and availability are unclear. It is recommended to inquire directly with the provider for more information.
⚪ Self host : Unknown.
It is unclear if Vision (TDX) offers a self-host option. Third-party vendors may provide hosting services, but specific information on self-hosting is not readily available for comparison.
⚪ Self host : Unknown.
There may be options for self-hosting through third-party vendors, but direct self-hosting by McKesson Paragon is unclear. Further investigation or inquiry may be needed for confirmation.


Care settings

Vision (TDX)
McKesson Paragon
⚪ General practice : Unknown.
The usage of Vision (TDX) in general practice (GP surgeries) is not well-documented in comparison to other systems like EMIS, TPP, Epic, and Cerner. Further research is needed for a definitive answer.
⚪ General practice : Unknown.
McKesson Paragon is primarily used in hospital settings and may not be commonly used in general practice (GP surgeries). Further research is needed to determine its prevalence in this setting.
⚪ Community care : Unknown.
The usage of Vision (TDX) in the community setting is not well-documented compared to other Electronic Health Record Systems in the NHS. Further research is needed for a definitive answer.
⚪ Community care : Unknown.
McKesson Paragon is primarily used in acute care settings and may not be commonly used in the community setting. Further research is needed to determine its prevalence in community healthcare environments.
⚪ Hospital and Acute : Unknown.
Vision (TDX) is not commonly used in acute hospital systems in comparison to other Electronic Health Record Systems in the NHS. Its prevalence and integration in acute care settings are unclear.
🟢 Hospital and Acute : Yes.
McKesson Paragon is commonly used in acute hospital systems, offering comprehensive solutions tailored to the specific needs of acute care settings.


Key features

Vision (TDX)
McKesson Paragon
🟢 Mobile version : Yes.
Vision (TDX) offers a mobile version for clinicians, allowing them to access the EHR on-the-go. This mobile version provides flexibility and convenience for healthcare professionals needing to access patient information remotely.
🟢 Mobile version : Yes.
McKesson Paragon offers a mobile version for clinicians, allowing them to access the EHR system on-the-go for convenient patient care. The mobile version is web-based, providing flexibility and accessibility.
⚪ Referral management : Unknown.
The referral management features of Vision (TDX) are unclear and require further investigation for comparison with other EHR systems in the NHS.
🟢 Referral management : Yes.
McKesson Paragon offers robust referral management features to streamline the process of referring patients to other healthcare providers, ensuring seamless coordination of care and improved patient outcomes.
⚪ Waiting list management : Unknown.
The availability of waiting list management features in Vision (TDX) is unclear and requires further investigation for comparison with other EHR systems.
⚪ Waiting list management : Unknown.
There is no clear information available regarding waiting list management features in McKesson Paragon EHR compared to other platforms.
⚪ Booking management : Unknown.
The booking management features of Vision (TDX) are not clearly specified in comparison to other EHR systems. Further investigation is needed to determine the extent of its booking management capabilities.
⚪ Booking management : Unknown.
McKesson Paragon's booking management features are not clearly specified in comparison to other EHR systems. Further information or clarification is needed to determine the presence of such features.
🟢 Document management : Yes.
Vision (TDX) offers robust document management features, allowing users to efficiently store, organize, and access patient records and other important documents within the EHR system.
🟢 Document management : Yes.
McKesson Paragon offers robust document management features, allowing users to efficiently store, organize, and retrieve patient records and other documents within the EHR system.
🟢 Decision support : Yes.
Vision (TDX) EHR includes clinical decision support features to assist healthcare providers in making informed decisions and improving patient care outcomes, enhancing overall efficiency and quality of care.
🟢 Decision support : Yes.
McKesson Paragon includes clinical decision support features to assist healthcare providers in making informed decisions and improving patient care outcomes.
🟢 Lab results : Yes.
Vision (TDX) supports lab results integration, allowing healthcare providers to easily access and view patient laboratory data within the EHR system, enhancing clinical decision-making and patient care.
🟢 Lab results : Yes.
McKesson Paragon supports lab results integration, allowing for seamless access to and viewing of lab test results within the EHR system, either manually or via an API.
🟢 Imaging : Yes.
Vision (TDX) supports imaging and radiography results, allowing users to view and manage these types of medical images within the EHR system, either manually or via an API integration.
🟢 Imaging : Yes.
McKesson Paragon supports imaging and radiography results, allowing for seamless integration of these diagnostic tests within the EHR system, enhancing overall patient care and treatment planning.
🟢 Billing : Yes.
Vision (TDX) includes a billing/invoicing feature, allowing users to manage financial aspects alongside patient records. This feature streamlines the billing process and ensures accurate invoicing for services provided.
🟢 Billing : Yes.
McKesson Paragon includes a billing/invoicing feature, allowing healthcare providers to efficiently manage and process financial transactions related to patient care within the EHR system.


API / data sharing

Vision (TDX)
McKesson Paragon
🟢 Patient portal : Yes.
Vision (TDX) offers a patient portal feature, allowing patients to access their health records, communicate with healthcare providers, schedule appointments, and view test results online.
🟢 Patient portal : Yes.
McKesson Paragon offers a patient portal feature, allowing patients to access their health information, communicate with providers, schedule appointments, and more, enhancing patient engagement and empowerment.
⚪ Patient app : Unknown.
It is unclear whether Vision (TDX) has a native patient app for Android or iOS. Further research or direct inquiry with the provider may be needed to determine this feature.
⚪ Patient app : Unknown.
McKesson Paragon's availability of a native patient app for Android and iOS is unclear. Further information or confirmation from the vendor may be required for a definitive answer.
⚪ Has API : Unknown.
The availability of an API for Vision (TDX) is not clearly stated or documented. Further investigation is needed to determine if this platform offers API capabilities for integration.
⚪ Has API : Unknown.
The availability of an API for McKesson Paragon is unclear compared to other EHR systems in the NHS. Further investigation is needed to determine if this platform offers API capabilities.
⚪ FHIR API : Unknown.
Vision (TDX) compliance with the FHIR API standard is not clearly documented. Further investigation or direct inquiry with the provider is recommended to confirm its FHIR compliance status.
⚪ FHIR API : Unknown.
McKesson Paragon's API FHIR compliance status is currently unknown in comparison to other Electronic Health Record Systems in the NHS.
⚪ API Documentation : Unknown.
There is no clear information available regarding the existence of public technical API documentation for Vision (TDX). Further research is needed to determine the availability of such documentation.
⚪ API Documentation : Unknown.
There is no clear information available regarding public technical API documentation for McKesson Paragon. Further research may be needed to determine the availability of such documentation.
🟢 Right of access support : Yes.
Vision (TDX) has facilities to support right of access requests, allowing users to easily access their own health information in compliance with data protection regulations.
🟢 Right of access support : Yes.
McKesson Paragon includes facilities to support right of access requests, ensuring compliance with regulations and enabling patients to easily access their health information.


When choosing between McKesson Paragon and Vision (TDX), healthcare providers should consider their specific needs and preferences. Paragon may be more suitable for organizations looking for a robust system with advanced functionalities, while Vision (TDX) could be a better fit for those prioritizing ease of use and customization. Ultimately, selecting the right EHR system depends on aligning the platform’s capabilities with the organization’s goals and requirements.